Restaurant in Mumbai to Change Name from Hitler’s Cross Due to Protests
Thursday, August 24th, 2006A small restaurant, featuring continental cuisine and hookahs, Hitler’s Cross aimed to distinguish itself as “different” amongst the crowded Mumbai restaurant market. The question is, did they go too far?
This reminds me a lot of the “Fat Bitch” controversy that went on here at Rutgers a while ago. I think it’s daft to think that something as simple as a restaurant could ever “rehabilitate Hitler.” I also think that simple boycotts are the proper way to resolve something like this. The restaurant owner should have every right to call his restaurant whatever he wants. People who may be offended by such a name have every right to boycott such a restaurant and to urge their friends to do the same. Granted they also have the right to protest such a name, but I just feel that attacking another’s freedom of speech is a negative use of protesting (considering it’s freedom of speech that grants one’s right to protest).
A restaurant called Hitler’s Cross would have failed in the long run anyway, methinks. All these protesters really did was hasten the process at the expense of the restaurant owner’s freedom of speech, and to me that’s no victory.
